Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Tabur vs Danny Thomas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Thomas analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Danny Thomas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tabur 0 - 0 Thomas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 47.52% of points on their second serve, while Thomas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 51.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Thomas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 60.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thomas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 52/ 26), with Thomas winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Thomas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 35/ 7), where as Thomas has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.1 while Thomas has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thomas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 35.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thomas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
234
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
541
High
24
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
61% (241-156)
Career Total W/L
55% (46-38)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Danny Thomas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (28/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (284/277) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.59 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1127/1832) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (752/1127) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (335/705) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (78/217) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (773/1860) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Jaime Faria
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Clement Tabur
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Danny Thomas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Danny Thomas
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(1) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Danny Thomas
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Danny Thomas
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Danny Thomas
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Danny Thomas
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Danny Thomas
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Danny Thomas
Player
Vuk Budic
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephan Gerritsen
Player
Danny Thomas
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Donald Young
Player
Danny Thomas
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
7
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
7
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tabur Vs Thomas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
